newyorkfather18 (September 29, 2008 at 6:23 am)

hahahahaThe American Dream?? Exactly how it was ....Good Summary hahahaha

israelfnp (September 16, 2008 at 1:04 am)

Amir,If YOU knew anything about the Rwanda massacre, you'd know it was more than a Tribal thing. The Hutus actually thought the Tutsis were an inferior race unworthy of life. NO different than other styles of Racism, whethe its white on black or black on black, their idea of "They aren't worthy to live" was the exact same. The Japanese, how about them, are they white? Their racial theories go back from the Samurai days to the genocidal ideas of the Rising Sun Empire that they were supreme.

amiranicholleatwork (September 16, 2008 at 12:02 am)

One has nothing to do with the other, tribal wars have been ongoing for centuries, but they were the same race, bigotry is not necessarily a white thing. I'm sure she knows all about Rwanda, ah do you?

israelfnp (September 15, 2008 at 11:57 pm)

"Well according to a class I took its not possible to be racist against white"Oh really? Tell your Canadian liberal ass teacher about the Rwanda Genocide. That will shut him up real fast.

amiranicholleatwork (September 15, 2008 at 9:27 pm)

Well according to a class I took its not possible to be racist against whites; Racism was created by whites in order to justify how they treated the natives and others. By degrading the other races into sub-humans they had no moral issues with enslaving and oppressing them. BTW the class was at a Canadian University.

israelfnp (September 15, 2008 at 8:57 pm)

I love guns too. Blacks do too! The Salem witch trials were 50% politically motivated frauds, 50% actual execution of dark-arts using satanists. Certain European staetes were far more inclined to abuse and oppress the Natives, such as the Spanish, while others such as the French enjoyed excellent trading relations with them. "You couldn't convince the White people of this"....THAT IS RACIST. THIS CARTOON IS RACIST AGAINST WHITES. That is my point. Based on fact? Yes. ENTIRELY based on fact? NO.

amiranicholleatwork (September 15, 2008 at 8:24 pm)

This is why free speech is beautiful, they can express their views and you can express yours. You can cry over the exaggerations all you want, they are based in fact. The colonizers showed little to no respect to the natives, they used slave labor, they burned people they suspected of witch craft, and they love their guns. Were they all the same, no of course not, but is it based in fact?

israelfnp (September 15, 2008 at 8:17 pm)

In addition, this utterly racist, agenda-driven cartoon portrays the whole of the European settlers as retarded, gun toting aggressors and the other races as innocent little sweet peas. No one mentions here that rogue American Indians attacked and looted the early Colonies. Cases did exist where the settlers did attack the Natives first such as Cortez and the Cannibal, Human-sacrificing Aztecs (whom all the other neighboring tribes hated viciously), but the idea the NRA came from the KKK?

israelfnp (September 15, 2008 at 8:10 pm)

"if the white man or the arab (I'm not Arab BTW) wasn't there to buy they wouldn't have had anyone to sell them too."That's not true either. African tribes sold each slaves to each other as well, it is how the White man and Arab man even discovered there was a means to buy slaves en masse in the first place. Inter-African slavery was going on well before 1492, for millenia. Regardless of whether Whites created a market, my point is that this cartoon is inaccurate, racist, and distortive.

amiranicholleatwork (September 15, 2008 at 8:02 pm)

It doesn't matter if the person who sold them was white or black, if the white man or the arab (I'm not Arab BTW) wasn't there to buy they wouldn't have had anyone to sell them too. It's the supply and demand thing, the one doing the demanding is just as liable if not more so then the one who is supplying.