|
rettinhousegames (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
so now I finally know why robots are not running around and burninating people! the "scientist" cant even afford lazer pointers and proper chairs!
spikesmth (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
HAHAHA, APPLE FAIL! Even Vista coulda pulled that off!
icedthai (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Sure, the whole number eigen values of the hamiltonian express the basic states of quanta in 3d1t space and it builds up from there. Granted I don't have a DS, but I would still say we have a pretty good understanding of the math involved at that level.
Human ai isn't special, especially if you watch Jerry Springer.
deepdivestudios (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Interesting. My hunch is that the relationships are there, but it's a matter of scale. We don't know enough about really small things or really big things to see the realtionships clearly. I seem to remember reading about the use of hamiltonians to achieve some insight into quantum systems. In any case, I like the comment. I give it six points.
varer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yeah "Something like...
"uhm... so, yeah! uhm... now, uhm... something like that."
:P" but hes really good.. he has done alot
SoulPhantomX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I suppose more complex interactions with not only the environment, but with users, and other agents(AI forms?) can be incorporated later on. As he said mid presentation, this is the raw of the raw.
Thanks for the presentation, this was informative and thought provoking, I have a lot of questions, and theories on the subject.
SoulPhantomX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Does that mean that AI can't form relationships or base their decisions on incoming situations that may effect others around them, the sole purpose is self preservation, but sometimes in life we have to sacrifice for the greater good, this ability defies his rule of energy conservation.
SoulPhantomX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Cause and effect?
so if someone attacks you(cause) you have the option to run or fight for survival (effect?)
EmmyKokoro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Something like...
"uhm... so, yeah! uhm... now, uhm... something like that."
:P
icedthai (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Nuclear decay does not have to be cause-effect induced. A particular atom may decay now or wait 14 billion years.
Arguably perhaps we don't know how to define the atom well enough to prove rigorously that it is also cause-effect grounded.
There are other examples along these lines that involve "quantum decisions". |
