Bobster986 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What happen to the cancer cure?

DrLex1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This will never make it into a car engine, because you'll need more energy to cause the hydrolysis of the salt water than the burning flame will produce. Just hook up the battery to an electromotor instead... The only eco-friendly way to make a car run on "water" is to do the hydrolysis in a plant using renewable energy sources. The major problem is finding a safe and efficient way to store a huge amount of the (extremely explosive) hydrogen in a car, without turning it into a bomb om wheels.

jsinur777 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

its not the oxygen or the hydrogen it self ignites... the reason it doesnt do it with plain water is its the sodium in the salt.. when it gets split into its natural form and makes contact with air, it ignites... hydrogen would just disapate

bluegrassdigital (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He is not using electrolysis to split the water. Of course electrolysis is very inefficient but there are other ways to get the molecule to split that are just becoming known that uses very little energy.

fireofenergy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I still think that "plain old" solar thermal is better because you get the energy from the sun instead of from the wall

BugNuggets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I meant the energy for the entire process, which you cover but I suspect your numbers since the commonly accepted efficiency for electrolysis is about 50% at best, no where near 80%. If you use this from a renewable or surplus source (i.e. nuclear power) you still run into the need to seperate the H and O because combined their explosive, seperate there just dangerous.

edwardszocs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

the energy comes from the burning hydrogen. But hydrogen must be produced too. If you divide the water into Hydrogen and oxygen (with electolysis) it uses about 50kW energy/kg, and by burning that amount hydrogen you get 40kW of energy. So overall the technology is not self-sustainable. It is only efficient if you produce the hydrogen from a renewable power source (solar, wind, etc). But then you need to transport and store the hydrogen, and this is the other big problem...

BugNuggets (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Hence the reason this isn't a solution to any energy crisis. If you start with water and end with water where is the energy coming from? Energy must balance.

commando7144 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

his radiofrequency machine has been tested on rats injected with cancer then gold nanoparticals injected in the cancerous cells and confirmed the rats where cancer free google his name

edwardszocs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

we ca not 'use up' the water because after the hydrogen burns, it turns into water again